Piracy approach a failure, say Hong Kong shipowners

Jan 19, 2010, 8:36PM EST
A furious statement by the Hong Kong Shipowners’ Association reflects the frustration felt by shipping firms at the world's inability to prevent pirate attacks.

The Hong Kong Shipowners’ Association (HKSOA) has called for governments to throw out the current response to pirates menacing ships off the Horn of Africa, accusing the international community of tolerating piracy instead of eliminating attacks.
This approach was sending out the message that piracy carries little risk for generous reward, the association said in a statement.

More than 1,500 seafarers have been taken hostage for ransom, often for months at a time, said the HKSOA, despite significant measures shipowners have taken to defend their crews.

The HKSOA has demanded a more robust approach from the international community.

This is a stance that will resonate across the shipping industry that is becoming increasingly frustrated with pirates who seem able to operate with impunity. Military patrols in the Gulf of Aden have prevented many attacks but the pirates have simply moved far out to sea.

The HKSOA questions why motherships that ferry smaller and faster skiffs deep into the ocean are not found and disabled or detained. Instead, pirates are allowed to return to these deepsea bases and continue their attacks.

It is extraordinary that governments today seem less able to protect shipping than they were almost 200 years ago,” the HKSOA lamented.

The association makes the point that if airlines were being hijacked as regularly as ships in the Indian Ocean, the response would be far more robust. There is merit in this argument. One failed attempt to bring down an airliner bound for the US on Christmas Day and airports have begun profiling half the world. Yet even though ships carry 90 percent of global trade, scores of pirate attacks and millions paid in ransoms are allowed to continue.

Waiting for democracy in Somalia to solve the problem has been suggested as an option, but it is a terrifically poor one. Somali democracy revolves around one man-one AK-47, rather than one man-one vote, and the sad reality is that the country will still be a basket case when Rip van Winkle wakes up.

There is only one way to tackle piracy, just like there was back in the days of buccaneers, Blackbeard and the skull and crossbones – bring out the guns. Blow pirate skiffs and motherships out of the water and this scourge of shipping will end.

There is too much money at stake on both sides for a kid gloves approach to work. Only when pirates know as they put out to sea that there’s a good chance they won’t return alive – or in the next few years – will they seek out a new profession.

 

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Steve Toby
I agree. The legal rules of engagement especially need to be revamped. Most of the captured pirates are being released; a few are in prison in Kenya, but I wonder what their sentences will be even if they are convicted.

Should the current situation continue, who's to blame shipowners who hire "privateers" to escort their ships? If navies and their civilian rulers don't shape up, they should expect to be replaced by those whose conscience isn't so well developed. There are plenty of people who will be happy to take the owners' money and earn it by shooting first and asking questions later. The navies sould be trying harder to prevent this from happening.
1/20/2010 4:10:26 PM
 
sean rajkumar
Please advise where one can find a copy of the the "furious statement" made by the HKSOA. Same might be useful to pass to other NGO's to increase awareness and pressure others to voice their opinions louder.
1/21/2010 12:32:53 PM
 
Greg Knowler
Thanks for your interest Sean. For a copy of the Hong Kong Shipowners' Association statement - released to the media on January 18, 2010 - please contact HKSOA managing director Arthur Bowring at hksoa@hksoa.org.
1/21/2010 8:05:39 PM
 
Jaap Stengs
Many years ago I recognized the fact that pirates cannot be stopped by
warships as is clear today.
Even Vice Adm. Bill Gortney, commander, Combined Maritime Forces now
understands this.
I am strongly opposed to arming ships crews and propose a different way to
address the problem:
Protection Against Pirates by Captain Jaap Stengs
This plan proposes to help protect shipping vessels from pirate attacks. Because
ship-owners and governments will not arm their ships, pirates are given a free-for-all
opportunity. Because piracy occurs mostly off the shores of countries with
widespread corruption, some authorities cooperate with the pirates. Overlooked or
assisted by the authorities and preying on unarmed vessels, attacking pirates have
nothing to fear and can act without peril.
By contrast, when set upon by pirates, the towing vessel London’s crew fired distress
rockets and the pirates ran for cover.
Protection provided by naval man-of-war ships is not effective because the seas are
vast. The Strait of Malacca is between 25 and 80 nautical miles wide. Nor can ships
rely on assistance from shore radio stations. When the Dutch vessel FRANS was on
fire off Dubai her emergency call was not answered.
“A proper pirate is a dead one”, is an old Wijdenesser saying. Yet arming sailors is
not the answer. Handling a gun properly takes months of training and, after all,
sailors did not choose a fighting career. Vigilance is the key. These days, only funloving
yachties fly the Jolly Roger. Pirates may disguise themselves as peaceful
fisherman until they suddenly attack.
Guarding the ship against piracy cannot be left solely to the ships’ crew. Dedicated
ship’s duties do not leave little extra time for patrolling nor do crew members
possess the proper training. Defending against boarding pirates with charged fire
hoses and a prayer is not effective against heavily armed attackers in the middle of
nowhere. The ISPS (International Ship and Port Facilities Code) does not offer
enough protection.
Seven to ten well-trained and heavily armed marines should be stationed aboard
ships transiting known perilous passages. Marines have but one objective; guard
and defend. Three marines should be on continuous watch duty; one on the port
bridge wing, one on the starboard bridge wing and one on the stern. This applies at
sea as well as in port. Training will be needed for best cooperation between
merchant sailors and marines. Of course, language and cultural differences will need
to be addressed.
TNO-FEL, a Dutch research institute, developed a training module to teach sailors
how to deal with pirates peacefully. Lack of interest from ship owners put an end to it.
This document may be used as a whole only.
© 2004 SEA-BORN WIJDENES HOLLAND (April 2008).
By Captain Jaap Stengs (ret.)
Nautilus.NL member #1156012
Zuiderdijk 41
1608 MV Wijdenes
Holland
FAQ’s and discussions.
Q: Isn’t your plan to expensive?
A: Considering the value of lost lives, lost personal effects and money, lost cargo
and ships, operational coast of patrolling man of war and ransom money, we may
break even or better.
Q: Your plan is simple. Should it be more detailed?
A: Experts on action by marines should work out the plans in detail, not I.
Q: Ship-owners will not pay for the marines. Who will?
A: Governments should bear the cost of defending their territory, including their fleet.
Or do you pay for the cruising police car and officers?
Q: What do you, a merchant Captain, know about protection by marines?
A: In 1990 I hired nine marines in the Port of Warri, Nigeria to protect ship, crew and
general cargo. Nothing was stolen.
1/24/2010 10:15:02 AM
 
Jaap Stengs
Many years ago I recognized the fact that pirates cannot be stopped by
warships as is clear today.
Even Vice Adm. Bill Gortney, commander, Combined Maritime Forces now
understands this.
I am strongly opposed to arming ships crews and propose a different way to
address the problem:
Protection Against Pirates by Captain Jaap Stengs
This plan proposes to help protect shipping vessels from pirate attacks. Because
ship-owners and governments will not arm their ships, pirates are given a free-for-all
opportunity. Because piracy occurs mostly off the shores of countries with
widespread corruption, some authorities cooperate with the pirates. Overlooked or
assisted by the authorities and preying on unarmed vessels, attacking pirates have
nothing to fear and can act without peril.
By contrast, when set upon by pirates, the towing vessel London’s crew fired distress
rockets and the pirates ran for cover.
Protection provided by naval man-of-war ships is not effective because the seas are
vast. The Strait of Malacca is between 25 and 80 nautical miles wide. Nor can ships
rely on assistance from shore radio stations. When the Dutch vessel FRANS was on
fire off Dubai her emergency call was not answered.
“A proper pirate is a dead one”, is an old Wijdenesser saying. Yet arming sailors is
not the answer. Handling a gun properly takes months of training and, after all,
sailors did not choose a fighting career. Vigilance is the key. These days, only funloving
yachties fly the Jolly Roger. Pirates may disguise themselves as peaceful
fisherman until they suddenly attack.
Guarding the ship against piracy cannot be left solely to the ships’ crew. Dedicated
ship’s duties do not leave little extra time for patrolling nor do crew members
possess the proper training. Defending against boarding pirates with charged fire
hoses and a prayer is not effective against heavily armed attackers in the middle of
nowhere. The ISPS (International Ship and Port Facilities Code) does not offer
enough protection.
Seven to ten well-trained and heavily armed marines should be stationed aboard
ships transiting known perilous passages. Marines have but one objective; guard
and defend. Three marines should be on continuous watch duty; one on the port
bridge wing, one on the starboard bridge wing and one on the stern. This applies at
sea as well as in port. Training will be needed for best cooperation between
merchant sailors and marines. Of course, language and cultural differences will need
to be addressed.
TNO-FEL, a Dutch research institute, developed a training module to teach sailors
how to deal with pirates peacefully. Lack of interest from ship owners put an end to it.
This document may be used as a whole only.
© 2004 SEA-BORN WIJDENES HOLLAND (April 2008).
By Captain Jaap Stengs (ret.)
Nautilus.NL member #1156012
Zuiderdijk 41
1608 MV Wijdenes
Holland
FAQ’s and discussions.
Q: Isn’t your plan to expensive?
A: Considering the value of lost lives, lost personal effects and money, lost cargo
and ships, operational coast of patrolling man of war and ransom money, we may
break even or better.
Q: Your plan is simple. Should it be more detailed?
A: Experts on action by marines should work out the plans in detail, not I.
Q: Ship-owners will not pay for the marines. Who will?
A: Governments should bear the cost of defending their territory, including their fleet.
Or do you pay for the cruising police car and officers?
Q: What do you, a merchant Captain, know about protection by marines?
A: In 1990 I hired nine marines in the Port of Warri, Nigeria to protect ship, crew and
general cargo. Nothing was stolen.
1/24/2010 10:16:02 AM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...

5/1/2012

Ricardo Allu
Send to pentamaq@gye.satnet.net